Reinsurer
The assuming company
The carrier that accepts ceded risk, underwrites portfolios rather than policies, and is paid to be there in the bad year.
Open the interactive version → definition, quiz, structure diagram and progress tracking
Definition
- Underwrites the cedent as much as the risk: rating adequacy, claims handling, reserving philosophy, growth appetite.
- Financial strength rating is its licence to trade — a downgrade can strip it of business overnight.
- Manages its own accumulations by buying retrocession and, increasingly, by issuing catastrophe bonds.
Worked example
Scenario · figures in USD
A reinsurer's year on one excess-of-loss account
A reinsurer writes a 100% share of a property per-risk layer for a single cedent. Premium is $40M. It pays 10% brokerage and carries 5% of premium in internal expense.| Premium written | $40M |
| Losses incurred | $22M |
| Brokerage (10%) | $4M |
| Internal expense (5%) | $2M |
| Loss ratio | 55.0% |
| Expense ratio | 15.0% |
| Combined ratio | 70.0% |
| Underwriting profit | $12M |
Check your understanding
On treaty business, what does the reinsurer principally underwrite?
The cedent's portfolio, pricing and management quality. Treaty cessions are automatic, so the reinsurer never sees policies one by one. It is buying into the cedent's underwriting discipline.
The reinsurer above wants to reduce its own peak exposure on this account. Which tool does it use?
Retrocession. When a reinsurer buys protection for its own assumed book, that cover is called retrocession.
Word problem
The same account renews. Premium falls 15% to $34M as the market softens, brokerage stays at 10% and internal expense at 5%, but losses come in at $27M. What is the combined ratio, and how much rate reduction would have kept it flat at 70%?
Show a hint
Reveal the worked answer
- Expenses = 15% × $34M = $5.1M
- Combined ratio = ($27M + $5.1M) ÷ $34M = 94.4%
- For a 70% combined with fixed 15% expense ratio, the loss ratio must be 55%
- Required premium = $27M ÷ 0.55 = $49.1M
- That is 23% above the expiring $40M, not 15% below it