Retrocession
Reinsurance of the reinsurer
A reinsurer buying protection for the book it has already assumed.
Open the interactive version → definition, quiz, structure diagram and progress tracking
Definition
- Primary uses: capping peak-zone catastrophe accumulation, protecting the whole-account net, and freeing capital for growth.
- Increasingly sourced from capital markets — catastrophe bonds, sidecars and collateralised retro rather than traditional carriers.
- The classic hazard is the spiral: risk ceded round a closed circle of reinsurers until a single loss returns to its originator several times over, as in the London Market Excess (LMX) spiral of the late 1980s.
Worked example
Scenario · figures in USD
A loss passing through three balance sheets
A cedent retains $200M per event and buys $300M excess of $200M. Its reinsurer, having assumed that layer, buys retro of $200M excess of $100M on its own net account. A single event costs the cedent $600M gross.| Gross loss to the original insurer | $600M |
| Cedent retention | $200M |
| Reinsurer pays (layer $300M xs $200M) | $300M |
| Loss above the top of the programme — back to cedent | $100M |
| Reinsurer's own retention under the retro | $100M |
| Retrocessionaire pays ($200M xs $100M) | $200M |
| Reinsurer's net loss | $100M |
| Cedent's net loss | $300M |
Check your understanding
In a retrocession, the reinsurer buying the cover is called the:
Retrocedent. The buyer retro-cedes, so it is the retrocedent. The seller is the retrocessionaire.
What is the "spiral" risk in retrocession markets?
The same loss circulating among a closed group and returning amplified. When a small group of carriers repeatedly retrocede to one another, a single large event is recycled through the circle and each participant can end up paying it several times.
Word problem
A reinsurer assumes a $400M excess of $100M layer at 100%. It retains $150M of that and retrocedes $250M excess of $150M. An event produces a $620M gross loss for the original cedent. What does each of the three parties bear?
Show a hint
Reveal the worked answer
- Cedent retention = $100M
- Reinsurer's layer covers $100M to $500M, so it pays the full $400M limit
- Loss above $500M = $620M − $500M = $120M, unprotected and back to the cedent
- Cedent's total net = $100M + $120M = $220M
- Within the reinsurer's $400M, the retro pays $400M − $150M = $250M (full limit)
- Reinsurer's net = $150M